Production and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibody against Recombinant Virus Coat Protein CP42
-
Naeimeh Shibaei
,
Jafar Majidi
,
Khadijeh Razavi
,
Ali Asghar Karkhane
,
Nemat Sokhandan-Bashir
,
Leili Aghebati-Maleki
Abstract
There are many studies related to the production of a ELISA kit for diagnosing virus infections. However, production of most kits depends on purification of whole virus particles, which involves the use of costly equipment and reagents. The purpose of this study was to check out if the anti-CP42 antibodies could be used as a diagnostic assay for detection of Grapevine fanleaf Virus (GFLV). In this study, recombinant GFLV coat protein gene related to selected antigenic determinants was inserted into pET-28a bacterial expression vector and the construct (pET-28a CP42) was cloned into E. coli strain (DE3). Expressed protein was verified with western blotting assay by the use of commercially available anti-GFLV antibody. The recombinant protein was purified using nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) resin. Balb/c mice were immunized with purified protein and splenocytes of hyperimmunized mice were fused with murine myeloma Sp2/0 cells. Positive hybridomas were selected by ELISA using CP42 as coating antigen. The results showed that monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific to CP42 has been successfully generated. Efficiency of produced antibody was analyzed by ELISA and western blotting assay using some confirmed grapevine samples. The infection was confirmed previously based on morphological features and ELISA assay, performed using commercial anti-GFLV antibody. The monoclonal antibody reacted with antigen in ELISA and immunoblot method. Our results demonstrated that anti recombinant CP42 monoclonal antibodies are able to diagnose whole virus in infected grapevine sample using ELISA test.
1. Greenfield EA. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Second edition. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: csh press; 2014.
2. Jafarzadeh A, Shokri F. TH1 and TH2 responses are influenced by HLA antigens in healthy neonates vaccinated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. IIran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012;11(4):308-15.
3. Ghasemi A, Salari MH, Zarnani AH, Pourmand MR, Ahmadi H, Shirazi MH, et al. Immunogenicity assessment of Brucella mellitensis HSP and TF proteins by immunized rabbit serum. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 12(2):192-4.
4. Ling KS, Zhu HY, Petrovic N, Gonsalves D. Serological Detection of Grapevine leafroll virus 2 Using an Antiserum Developed against the Recombinant Coat Protein†. Journal of Phytopathology. 2007;155(2):65-9.
5. Andret-Link P, Schmitt-Keichinger C, Demangeat G, Komar V, Fuchs M. The specific transmission of Grapevine fanleaf virus by its nematode vector Xiphinema index is solely determined by the viral coat protein. Virology 2004; 320(1):12-22.
6. Sokhandan Bashir N, Pashaei A, Doulati-Baneh H.Characterization of the Full Length Coat Protein Gene of Iranian Grapevine fanleaf virus isolates, genetic variation and phylogenetic analysis. Iran J Biotech 2011; 9(3):213-21.
7. Pourrahim R, Farzadfar S, Golnaraghi AR, Ahoonmanesh A. Incidence and distributions of Grapevine fanleaf virus in north-east of Iran. Plant Pathology Journal 2007;6:254-9.
8. Rakhshandehroo F, Pourrahim R, Zamani Zadeh H, Rezaee S, Mohammadi M. Incidence and distribution of viruses infecting Iranian vineyards. Journal of Phytopathology. 2005;153:480-4.
9. Izadpanah K, Zaki-Aghl M, Zhang YP, Daubert SD, Rowhani A. Bermuda grass as a potential reservoir host for Grapevine fanleaf virus. Plant Disease 2003;87(10):1179-82.
10. Zaki-Aghl M, Izadpanah K. Serological and molecular identification and prevalence of Grapevine fanleaf virus in Iran. Iranian jouran of Plant Pathology 2003; 39(3-4):161-71.
11. Sokhandan-Bashir N, Pashaei A, Doulati-Baneh H. Characterization of the full length coat protein gene of Iranian Grapevine fanleaf virus isolates, genetic variation and phylogenetic analysis. Iranian Journal of Biotechnolo 2011; 9(3):213-21.1
2. Martelli GP, Walter B, Pink L. Grapevine Fanleaf Virus.CMI/AAB Description of Plant Viruses No. 385. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists, Kew, Surrey, England. 2001.
13. Koolivand D, Sokhandan-Bashir N, Behjatnia SAA, Jafari Joozani RA. Detection of Grapevine fanleaf virus by immunocapture reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR) with recombinant antibody. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 2014;47(17):2070-7.
14. Nickel O, Targon MLPN, Fajardo TVM, Machado MA, Trivilin AP. Polyclonal antibodies to the coat protein of Apple stem grooving virus expressed in Escherichia coli: production and use in immunodiagnosis. Fitopatologia Brasileira. 2004;29(5):558-62.
15. Fajardo TVM, Barros DR, Nickel O, Kuhn GB, Zerbini FM. Expression of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 coat protein gene in Escherichia coli and production of polyclonal antibodies. Fitopatologia Brasileira.2007;32(6):496-500.
16. Ward E, Foster SJ, Fraaije BA, McCartney HA. Plant pathogen diagnostics: immunological and nucleic acid- based approaches. Annals of Applied Biology 2004;145(1):1-16.
17. Rowhani A. Use of F(ab') 2 Antibody Fragment in ELISA for Detection of Grapevine Viruses. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1992; 43(1):38-40.
18. Sokhandan-Bashir N, Koolivand D, Behjatnia A. preparation of polyclonal antibodies to Grapevine fanleaf virus coat protein expressed in escherichia coli. Ansinet biotechnology 2015; 14(4):173-80.
19. Parker JM, Guo D, Hodges RS. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 1986; 25(19):5425-32.
20. Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett 1990; 276(1-2):172-4.
21. Ponnuswamy PK, Prabhakaran M, Manavalan P.Hydrophobic packing and spatial arrangement of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980; 623(2):301-16.
22. Saha S, Raghava GP. Prediction of continuous B-cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network. Proteins 2006; 65(1):40-8.
23. El-Manzalawy Y, Dobbs D, Honavar V. Predicting linear B-cell epitopes using string kernels. J Mol Recognit 2008;21(4):243-55.
24. Darnell S, Riese M, inventors; Precise Predictions of Linear B Cell Epitopes in Protean 3D2012.
25. Bordoli L, Kiefer F, Arnold K, Benkert P, Battey J, Schwede T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nat Protocols 2008; 4(1):1-13.
26. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9(40):1471-2105.
27. Haste Andersen P, Nielsen M, Lund O. Prediction of residues in discontinuous B-cell epitopes using protein3D structures. Protein Sci 2006; 15(11):2558-67.
28. UK L. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227(5259):680-5.
29. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry. 1976;72(1-2):248-54.
30. Converse RH, Martin RR. ELISA Methods for Plant Viruses. In: Hampton R, Ball E, DeBoer S, editors. Serological Methods for Detection and Identification of Viral and Bacterial Plant Pathogens: A Laboratory Manual. USA: The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.; 1990. p. 179-96.
31. Majidi J, Zavaran Ilosseini A, Hassan Z, Alimohamadian M. Production of monoclonal antibody against human immunoglobulin Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 2000;1(2):81-7.
32. Chung CT, Niemela SL, Miller RH. One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86(7):2172-5.
33. Etienne L, Clauzel JM, Fuchs M. Simultaneous Detection of Several Nepoviruses Infecting Grapevine in a Single DAS-ELISA Test Using Mixed Antisera. Journal of Phytopathology 1991; 131(2):89-100.
34. Wetzel T, Jardak R, Meunier L, Ghorbel A, Reustle GM, Krczal G. Simultaneous RT/PCR detection and differentiation of arabis mosaic and grapevine fanleaf nepoviruses in grapevines with a single pair of primers. J Virol Methods 2002; 101(1-2):63-9.
35. Nölke G, Cobanov P, Uhde-Holzem K, Reustle G, Fischer R, Schillberg S. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)- specific antibodies confer GFLV and Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Molecular Plant Pathology 2009; 10(1):41-9.
36. Huss B, Muller S, Sommermeyer G, Walter B, Van Regenmortel MHV. Grapevine Fanleaf Virus Monoclonal Antibodies: their Use to Distinguish Different Isolates. Journal of Phytopathology 1987; 119(4):358-70.
37. Huss B, Walter, B., Etienne, L. & Van Regenmortel, M.H.V. . Grapevine fanleaf virusdetection in various grapevineorgans using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Vitis 1986; 25:178-88.
38. Kusano N, Iwanami T, Narahara K, Tanaka M.Production of monoclonal antibodies specific for the recombinant viral coat protein of Apple stem grooving virus-citrus isolate and their application for a simple, rapid diagnosis by an immunochromatographic assay. J Virol Methods 2014; 195:86-91.
39. Fasihi-Ramandi M, Nedjad-Moghaddam A, Arabsalmany F, Asgari S, Ahmadi-Renani S. Production and characterization of monoclonal and polyclonal antibody against recombinant outer membrane protein. American Journal of Immunology. 2014;10:56-62.
40. Fasihi-Ramandi M, Amani J, Salmanian A-H, Moazzeni SM, Ahmadi K. Production and Characterization of New Anti-Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibody. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 14(5):502-8.
41. Ridge SR, Vizard AL. Determination of the optimal cutoff value for a serological assay : an example using the Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Value for a Serological Assay: an Example Using the Johne' s Absorbed EIA. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31(5):1256-61.
42. Eris FN, Akisu C, Aksoy U. Evaluation of Two ELISA and Two Indirect Hemagglutination Tests for Serodiagnosis of Pulmonary Hydatid Disease. Korean J Parasitol 2009; 47(4):427-9.
43. Noel Masihi K, Lange W. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of influenza type-specific antibodies. J Immunol Methods 1980; 36(2):173-9.
44. Silva JM, Carnelossi PR, Bijora T, Facco CU, Picoli MHS, Souto ER, et al. Immunocapture-RT-PCR detection of Cassava common mosaic virus in cassava obtained from meristem-tip culture in Paraná state. Tropical Plant Pathology 2011; 36:271-5.
45. Yang JG, Wang FL, Chen DX, Shen LL, Qian YM, Liang ZY, et al. Development of a one-step immunocapture real- time RT-PCR assay for detection of Tobacco mosaic virus in soil. Sensors (Switzerland) 2012; 12(12):16685-94.
46. Schellenberger P, Sauter C, Lorber B, Bron P, Trapani S,Bergdoll M, et al. Structural insights into viral determinants of nematode mediated grapevine fanleaf virus transmission. PLoS Pathogens 2011; 7(5):1-14.
47. Gottschamel J, Castellano M, Maghuly F, Laimer M.Detection of Virus like particles (Vlps) by ISEM in transgenic grapevines expressing different GFLV CP- constructs. Biotechnology, VIBT- BOKU, 1190: Bodenkultur, VIENNA, Austria 2008.
48. Rudolph R, Lilie H. In vitro folding of inclusion body proteins. Faseb J 1996; 10(1):49-56.
49. Xing L, Kato K, Li T, Takeda N, Miyamura T, HammarL, et al. Recombinant Hepatitis E Capsid Protein Self- Assembles into a Dual-Domain T = 1 Particle Presenting Native Virus Epitopes. Virology 1999; 265(1):35-45.
50. Roos WH, Bruinsma R, Wuite GJL. Physical virology.Nat Phys. 2010;6(10):733-43.
51. Zlotnick A, Aldrich R, Johnson JM, Ceres P, Young MJ.Mechanism of capsid assembly for an icosahedral plant virus. Virology 2000; 277(2):450-6.
52. Horsfall AC, Hay FC, Soltys AJ, Jones MG. Epitope mapping. Immunology Today 1991; 12(7):211-3.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 16, No 1 (2017) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Capsid protein Epitopes Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) Monoclonal antibodies | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
